<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Zen of CSS Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.code-zen.net/2008/the-zen-of-css-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.code-zen.net/2008/the-zen-of-css-design/</link>
	<description>Peter Anselmo&#039;s Home on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:43:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.code-zen.net/2008/the-zen-of-css-design/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code-zen.net/?p=127#comment-5</guid>
		<description>@Peter - Thanks for providing such an honest review. I&#039;m so tired of book reviews that don&#039;t tell the whole story. I especially like the bit about word-stuffing for the sake of word count.

There are plenty of web books I haven&#039;t read - including this one - but I&#039;d agree that many are too fast for the beginner yet not enough for the experienced.

As for the little 2 cell table... if it really is tabular data, then it should be a table, otherwise I might use a Definition List (if it&#039;s semantically appropriate) or some combo of divs, spans, strongs, and/or ems.

Being that this book was published in February 2005, the bulk of the writing was presumably done in 2004 when the web standards (and the &quot;don&#039;t use tables for layout&quot;) movement was still shouting like crazy to win over few converts. So it doesn&#039;t surprise me that they&#039;d be more idealists and gloss over any compromises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter &#8211; Thanks for providing such an honest review. I&#8217;m so tired of book reviews that don&#8217;t tell the whole story. I especially like the bit about word-stuffing for the sake of word count.</p>
<p>There are plenty of web books I haven&#8217;t read &#8211; including this one &#8211; but I&#8217;d agree that many are too fast for the beginner yet not enough for the experienced.</p>
<p>As for the little 2 cell table&#8230; if it really is tabular data, then it should be a table, otherwise I might use a Definition List (if it&#8217;s semantically appropriate) or some combo of divs, spans, strongs, and/or ems.</p>
<p>Being that this book was published in February 2005, the bulk of the writing was presumably done in 2004 when the web standards (and the &#8220;don&#8217;t use tables for layout&#8221;) movement was still shouting like crazy to win over few converts. So it doesn&#8217;t surprise me that they&#8217;d be more idealists and gloss over any compromises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

